Michaito Ichimaru
Nagasaki, August 9, 1945
Q No.1: What
happened to the writer at the time of air attack?
Michaito
Ichimaru is a professor of medicine at the Nagasaki University School of
Medicine. As a witness to the
bombardment in Nagasaki, he gives us an unusual and striking view of nuclear
warfare. He writes about the Nagasaki bombing from the angle of a participant
and has selected his details with utmost care to communicate the horrors he had
witnessed.
It
was the month of August in 1945 when the writer was a first year student in Nagasaki
Medical School. It was August 9, when he
set out for his School at the usual time of eight in the morning. Luckily, he had to come back because his
train had been derailed in an accident.
He returned to his hostel room.
At
11 am he heard the sound of a B-29 passing overhead. After a while, the air flashed with a
brilliant yellow light and there was a huge blast of wind. He got terrified and
ran to save his life. He hid himself in
a toilet with a fellow student. Every
thing around them was shattered. He was hit in his shoulder by a piece of glass
and was bleeding. When his senses
restored, he saw the horrible destruction around him. All the walls had changed
in to a heap of bricks. The sky had
turned black and the black rain started to fall.
This
was the writers experience at the time of nuclear attack.
Q No. 2: What was the condition of
people coming back from Urakami?
When
the writer came to his senses, he tried to go to his medical School in
Urakami. It was very close to the center
of attack. Here the rate of radiation
was very high. He tried to go ahead but
could not because the fire had broken out everywhere. He saw the people who
were coming back from Urakami. Their
condition was very bad. Their clothes
were tattered, the skin hung with their bodies and their limbs were
missing. They were terrified to death
and looked with vacant eyes. They were
still baffled and shocked. There were
dead bodies lying around with white edges of bones showing through. Almost all living or dead were badly charred.
The
effect on the people was so tremendous that none of them survived. All the victims died in the coming few
weeks. The humanity was helpless before
the immense power of weapons. The war
was won but the humanity lost. The politics
came on front and civilization was dragged back. The butchered bodies of men cried for justice
but there was no one to listen to this crying entity. The scene was horribly pathetic and
severe. It looked like a slap on the
face of so called “champions” of humanity and human rights.
Q No. 3: What
was the scene in Urakami?
The writer managed to enter Urakami
the next day. In Urakami the condition
was heart-rending. Still too many
students, doctors and patients were crying there for help. They were in a very bad condition and wanted
water badly. Every one was severely
wounded. The buildings had reduced to
ashes, only their skeletons remained standing.
Writer heard many voices in pain.
He was unable to bear it. Even
now when he remembers them he shudders with horror, anguish and grief. Every thing around had been perished. The trees had lost all their leaves. The ladies were crying in their last
moments. They all suffered from many
diseases because their bodies had been melted from inside on account of
tremendous effects of the radiations.
The writer tried to help them but he could not save them from
death. All his friends died in few
weeks.
Urakami was totally destroyed with
its buildings, vegetation, animals and men.
There was nothing left except the debris, smoke and ashes. Mutilated
human dead bodies were mocking at the ambition of barbaric human passions. It was the worst destruction caused by man on
his fellow beings, and that only for some pieces of land. The man won but the humanity lost, leaving a
trial of chaos and darkness behind it.
Urakami became the graveyard of man and humanity alike.
Q No. 4: What
did the healthy people do for the survivors?
After the attack Nagasaki was left in
ruins. Too many people were subjected to
heavy material and physical loss. Everyone was badly injured. So the healthy
people had to come forward to help the survivors. The writer himself took part in these
activities. He brought many of his
friends to the survivor camps. The
condition of these survivors was pitiable.
They cried in pain. They were
desperately trying to live but were helpless before the tremendous power of
nuclear weapons. So many people died,
even a larger number got disabled. The healthy people helped to rehabilitate
these survivors with full devotion. One
of the writer's jobs was to contact the families of missing people. The
schools, where they established the camps for survivors, presented a hellish
picture. There were deaths, groans,
shrieks and a terrible stench. Writer
remembered it as inferno.
A large number of People died. It became difficult to dispose of their dead
bodies. So they burnt these bodies in
piles of wood. Writer could clearly see
the bowels moving in the fire. Healthy
people had to do a lot to meet the needs of this situation.
Q No 5: What
is the Conclusion drawn by the writer?
Dr. Michaito Ichimaru recalls a
nightmare to shake us from our slumber.
He narrates the destruction caused by an inhuman nuclear attack on
civilian population by the allied forces during the final phase of Second World
War. It is not the whole account of this
event but is only a glimpse of it. He is
the eyewitness of this infernal day and narrates it truthfully so that we can
see the future of the present world in this perspective.
The thesis of the writer is to
condemn the human beings on their mad race of weaponization. He urges us to realize the situation and its
expected outcome. The world should leave this enmity and hostility for the welfare
of the human race.
At the end of the essay he says that
the souls of his friends will never rest in peace if mankind does not renounce
the nuclear weapons and their use for the destruction of innocent people.
Zbrdst
ReplyDeleteReally helpfull and standard notes💗🙏
ReplyDeletePlz tell me about the question
ReplyDeleteHow does the essay affect us? Does it change our thinking or your understanding of nuclear warfare?
Sir ky qustion kaafi helpful hein
Delete