Liaquat
Ali Khan
Pakistan and the
Modern World
Q. No. 1: What
were the differences between the Hindus and the Muslims?
Liaquat Ali Khan was the first prime
minister of Pakistan. On a visit to U.S.A he addressed the Americans in the
University of Kansas City. In his
address he threw light on the demand, creation and future of Pakistan. He
enlisted the causes that led to the creation of Pakistan.
The main
cause was that of the differences present in the Hindu and the Muslim ways of
life. In the sub-continent one hundred million Muslims lived with three hundred
million Hindus. Their ways of living,
their history, their heroes, their opinions and their beliefs were totally
different. They came in conflict at almost every step. Moreover, the Muslims were ruling Hindustan
before the British, so it was natural for the British as well as the Hindus to
be hostile to them. The gulf between these
two nations was so unfathomable that it was impossible for them to live
together. Just consider if the touch of a Muslim could have corrupted the
religion or belief of a Hindu, so there was no question of their living
together in harmony.
The basic difference was
socio-religious. The Muslims believed in one God but the Hindus had many gods.
The Muslims believed in the Prophets of Allah and specially in the last
Prophet, (P.B.U.H) but the Hindus did not. Their rites and rituals were quite
contrary to each other. The social
system of Islam stood in sheer contrast with the Hindu ways of living. The
Muslims believed in equality of all men while the Hindus observed a strict
caste system. They considered the
members of upper caste as super-human and the members of lower castes were
thought to be semi-human. The lower classes had no rights and they were not
even a allowed to enter in the cities while Islam was totally opposed to such
beliefs and practices. The Muslims
regarded even priesthood as unnecessary hurdle in the relation of man and his
Creator. The Muslims had definite laws of inheritance but the Hindus did not
have. Islam stressed on trade while the Hindus preferred interest. The Muslims gave the right of private
ownership to all whether a man or woman but the Hindus did not. They treated
their woman as a “thing” and gave no rights to her but Islam gave respect to a
lady and she was given all the human rights.
The differences of these two nations
were so deep rooted and pervasive that it had become impossible for both of
them to co-exist. The differences were
so deep and wide that even their dressing style, eating habits and the way of
constructing their homes were at the opposite corners of a gulf.
If we carefully analyze these
factors, we come to know that the demand of Pakistan was quite reasonable. These differences were so strong as to cause serious
conflicts between the two nations, which have now been dissolved to some
extent, by the creation of Pakistan.
QUESTION# 2
What
is freedom? Why did the Muslims of the sub-continent demand a separate homeland
for themselves?
Every man has a right to live
freely, so is the case with the nations.
All the nations have a right to spend their lives according to their own
specific principles and codes of life.
Freedom means to be free in all respects. In past, the freedom was considered to be an
external phenomenon. A nation free from
foreign domination was considered to be free. But today its meanings have
widened. Now freedom means to be free physically as well as mentally. The
freedom of belief, the freedom of action and the freedom of expression all help
to construct this idea. The true freedom
is to be free from want, from poverty and disease. These factors are very
important to make a nation strong. If a
nation is lacking in all these aspects, it can never be able to preserve its
freedom because to get the freedom is hard but to maintain it, is harder.
In the British India the Muslim were
leading a backward life. They were not
given equal chances to develop side by side with the Hindus. Almost all the Muslims were uneducated; they
were not in the jobs. Civil and military bureaucracy was in the hands of the
British or the Hindus. The Muslims had
no industries. They had no traders. They had very few skilled people. In a backward country, the Muslims were even
more backward economically and industrially.
Politically,
the Hindus joined hands with the British against the Muslims. As a result of all these conspiracies the
Muslims were undermined at every stage.
The Hindus cheated the Muslims in all the joint movements and left them
in lurch. A glaring example is the
Tehrik-e-Khilafat, when Mr. Gandhi retreated with out taking the Muslim leaders
in confidence and the Muslims had to bear the brunt of this war and its
consequences. They were victimized in every way.
Religiously, the Hindus were very
intolerant towards all other religions, especially Islam. Every other day there erupted the Hindu-
Muslim clashes on religious grounds. in fact India was badly plagued with these
riots.
These were the conditions that
prevailed before the demand of Pakistan.
The Muslims realized that in British India, their future would be
completely tarnished and they would never be able to make themselves developed
in any way. So they decided to make the
demand of Pakistan. It was a reasonable
demand on political, geographical and human grounds. With utmost efforts they managed to carve the
name of Pakistan on the map of the World.
Q No. 3: What
were the problems of Pakistan as a new state?
In 1947, Pakistan was carved out on
the map of the world. The Muslims, being
backward and victimized in the united India, were not expected to build up a
new state of eighty million people. The
infrastructure of the government was yet not made. It had to be started from scratch. They had no capital and no flag. The administrative machinery had to be built
up from zero. Pakistan was given an army but its personnel were dispersed far
and wide. They had no military equipment. Their share of the military
equipment of the British India, which was allotted to them on paper, remained
largely undelivered even after too many years.
The industrial and economical base of the nation was practically
nothing. There was no industry, trade or
skilled workers in the country.
The biggest problem that Pakistan had to face was the inrush of seven
million homeless refugees who had been driven out of India. They came over to Pakistan in a miserable
plight to seek shelter.
It was the resolution and faith of the Pakistanis that supported them in
this time to solve all these problems and a strong country was created in the
world by a determined and brave nation.
Question # 4
How
was the creation of Pakistan necessary for the peace of the world?
After the Second World War, scenario of the world greatly
changed. The British had to leave their
colonies. India was also a colony of
Britain and the international pressure forced them to leave India too. But before leaving India, they had to divide
it into two parts; India and Pakistan.
The creation of Pakistan was very vital for the world peace. The Muslim and the Hindu factions of India
always remained at daggers drawn. Their
leaders and followers all were incompatible with each other. Communal violence was a matter of every
day. Both the communities were highly
intolerant and violent towards each other.
Its stark evidence came at the time of migration when thousands of men
were slaughtered mercilessly. The enmity
and hostility was let loose and inhuman cruelty was witnessed.
By the creation of Pakistan, this
problem was solved once and for all. But
if these two inflammable nations would have to live together, the intensity and
magnitude of disruption could easily be gauged.
In such a case, the sub-continent would have become a danger zone in
Asia. The peace of the whole world would have been on stake. Even now, when they live in separate
countries, they have to fight several wars but if these wars were to take place
inside a single country, the extent of danger would have been thousand times
more than it is now.
So the creation of Pakistan was
important for the peace of the world as well as for the development of the
Muslims of the sub-continent.
Q No. 5: How
can the Western Countries help third-world countries?
The Asian countries had been
languishing under the British rule for many centuries. They had to undergo two world wars as their
fuel. Britain badly exploited and looted
the resources of this region during the middle ages.
The eighteenth and nineteenth
centuries were the times, when on one hand these oppressed countries of the
East were fighting to get themselves free from the clutches of slavery while on
the other hand the West was making enormous progress on a very swift pace. The industrialization and the advent of
science had altogether changed the face of the world civilization. These were the times that the eastern people
missed due to the tyranny of the West.
They were pushed at least two centuries back.
Now, when they have gained their
freedom, they can get this treasure of knowledge and skills from the West and
utilize it in their own region. The
differences between the East and the West have created a wide gulf between the
living standards of both the people. The
dissatisfied and deprived masses of this region are quite impatient they want
to wade through this gulf as soon as possible.
This impatience can cause some serious problems for the peace of the
world. The West and specially America
should share its fund of knowledge, skill and scientific progress with these
backward nations so that the balance in the world civilization can be
established and maintained. In this way
the world can be saved from the revolutions, wars and riots.
The ideological funds, like the
values of liberty, freedom of expression, rights of the individual and
democracy can also be shared with these people.
This is the only way to create equilibrium in the world.
knowlegeable if u take it
ReplyDeletehelpful for those who dont have a book what i think is that people no need to buy book...if they has this page... oooops but i already get
ReplyDeleteIts good
ReplyDeleteIts very easy notes thanks for make it
ReplyDeletewell
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot everyone😀
ReplyDeletei want answer of this qution ...
ReplyDeletewhat is the real meaning of freedom according to liaquat ali khan?